I. Whether Doe’s claim for injunctive relief is moot now because after the commencement of litigation, the University altered its sexual harassment policy to eliminate the general requirement of eye-witness corroboration, and because Doe has deferred enrollment and is not enrolled for the upcoming semester?

II. Whether the University can be liable for damages under Title IX for student-on-student sexual harassment, even if the student victim experienced just one specific incident of harassment, and the student victim did not suffer additional acts of harassment after she reported it to the University?